![]() ![]() Shipping charges start at $799 and vary based on the size, weight, packaging, and/or the value of the item. ![]() You will need tools and/or equipment to open the crate. ![]() Deliveries can take anywhere from 6 to 9 weeks to be delivered.ĭelivered in a crate, to your front door. Shipping charges start at $999 and vary based on the size, weight, packaging, and/or the value of the item. Inspecting, and removing packaging materials and does not include installation or setting up the item. The item will be delivered to your home and placed in the desired room. He has had these printed up in a small booklet which is now included with each new machine sold.Note: Made-to-Order items typically include a lead time or custom delivery window that is added to the delivery time.Ĭhairish Express In-Home deliveries are currently only offered for international cross-border shipments. In searching though old company records, Meshes recently uncovered a stack of old sausage recipes from around the world (39 in all), along with 25 general food recipes. But even to keep the grinders at current prices the metal parts have to be ``cast in Taiwan,'' Meshes explains. ``A man wrote from New York City to say that his family bought their first Universal grinder in 1912 for just 87 cents.'' The writer felt that current prices, from $23 to $35 depending on size, were too high. What Meshes describes as ``the new-old love affair'' in the kitchen prompts between 20 and 25 letters a day from users. ![]() ``I happen to know,'' Meshes says, ``that the mold for that particular cutter was last used a hundred years ago.'' The modern blade, however, fit the antique.Īpart from visiting trade shows, Meshes relies on word-of-mouth advertising to promote sales. Many people write or stop by to tell Meshes that the machine they now use was first clamped to a table ``in grandma's kitchen.'' A recent letter contained a cutter blade that needed replacing. The introduction of nylon brushes to reduce the wear of metal on metal is the only recent improvement, ``and that is a materials rather than a design change,'' Meshes points out.Ī standard feature of any cast-iron product of simple design, like the hand grinder, is its durability. The original design was so simple and so effective that barely more than three design changes have been made in the machine in the intervening years, ``and those were largely cosmetic,'' Meshes says. She herself has two hand grinders stored away which she hasn't used ``in years.''Īnita Hirsch of the Rodale (Organic Gardening Magazine) test kitchens says that their hand grinder is rarely used, ``except for making chopped liver.'' That is a comment that has been frequently made to Meches, even by poeple who say they are major users of electric food processors.īack in 1842 the first meat grinder, called the Universal as it still is today, was patented in the United States, though Meshes isn't certain that similar machines were not developed independently in other parts of the world. But not, she says, if the electric one ``is on the kitchen counter and you have to fetch the hand grinder from a storage cupboard.'' Jean Hewitt acknowledges that there are some ground-food textures that only a hand grinder will produce, and that in some rare instances using a hand grinder might even be quicker than using an electric one. The trend towards gourmet, make-it-from-scratch cooking - which food editors, among them Jean Hewitt of Family Circle magazine, say started some eight to 10 years ago - has sparked what Meshes describes as a mild resurgence in the use of the hand grinder. Although the demand is hardly overwhelming (sales hover around 50,000 units a year, according to his figures), ``it's consistent.'' Twenty-five years of sales experience convinced him that even in this age of push-button convenience there should be a steady demand for the hand-operated grinder. Meshes was convinced he wouldn't lose by buying the rights to this nearly 150-year old invention. While there was a good deal of nostalgia behind the decision, Mr. So he made up his mind: He would buy up the rights to its manufacture. As he saw it, an American original was threatened with extinction. When James Meshes heard the news two years ago that the Universal grinder - that hand-operated forerunner of today's motorized food processor - would soon be pulled from the market, his reaction was one of dismay. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() "It took me about 4 years to get the product off the ground," Orion admitted, with the first two years committed strictly to the product's design and color. Germaphobes will appreciate the seamless, uncomplicated design of a swing door refrigerator.Initially a collaboration between Orion and his aunt and uncle, who bankrolled the business, the company experienced what can best be described as a soft launch. ![]() This may seem like a small detail, but refrigerator handles are notorious germ hot-spots, and that number only doubles when you have two refrigerator doors. Single-door fridges are usually much easier to close so you won’t ever have to worry about if you properly shut it. Keep in mind though that swing doors take up more room than their French door counterparts. Swing Door Easier to close.įrench-door fridges oftentimes need to pushed closed. Most of the biggest models on the market are made with French doors, allowing you to size up to have a bit more room to store and organize food or beverages. ![]() More room to organizeĪ French-door refrigerator has multiple tiers and drawers that allow you to use either the width of the fridge in its entirety, or split up items into perfectly organized sections inside of the refrigerator. With French doors, you have the option of opening only one door at a time, letting out less cold air and using less energy. Whenever a refrigerator door is opened, cold air is let out, causing the machine to work harder to keep everything inside at the designated cool temperature. It’s an easy way to give VIP placement to your most accessed foods and beverages. With the fridge on the top, you’ll be able to see your produce right when you open the doors, without having to bend down uncomfortably. Unlike other styles of refrigerators, French door fridges feature the freezer on the bottom, usually as a pull-out drawer. This is better for kitchens with limited space, meaning you won’t have such a tight squeeze behind you when you maneuver around the most-utilized room in the house. With two doors swinging in opposite directions instead of one, wide-swinging door, the clearance is much more narrow on a French door fridge. Two doors, or one door? That is the question. French Doors or Swing Doors: Which is Right for Your Kitchen? When the freezer is on the bottom, there are often organizing baskets or shelves to help you keep everything in order, as well as shelves on the door for even more well-organized food storage. Produce and beverages are clearly on display without having to hunch or bend over to sift through lower shelves. With a freezer on the bottom, the refrigerator sits at eye level, making for easier access to your most utilized part of the appliance. Bottom Freezer Puts the fridge at eye level. Drawer freezers can sometimes feel small with limited storage, while top freezers evoke the feeling of a wide open space to store your essentials and frozen treats. When the freezer is on the top of the refrigerator, there is typically more usable space to store your favorite frozen goods. While that might not effect your energy bill significantly, you can have peace of mind that you are doing your part to reduce electricity consumption. Department of Energy says that refrigerators with top freezers us 10 to 25% less energy than appliances with bottom freezers. While all appliances have varying Energy Star ratings, it’s typically a safe bet that a top-freezer is more energy efficient in your home. Top Freezer or Bottom Freezer: Which is right for your kitchen?įreeze up top, or down below? Top Freezer More energy efficient. Crisp, modern lines, silver trim, and bold colors make functionality feel fabulous. The Big Chill Pro Line combines the best in present-day professional performance and contemporary design. ![]() ![]() ![]() Ghost of Tsushima doesn’t falter in that department and is a more than fitting swan song for the PlayStation 4 era. ![]() This level of breathtaking spectacle and irrefutable quality that has defined PlayStation Studios for a generation or more. Riding into battle on horseback to defeat a seemingly immovable force is the kind of scene that will send chills down the back of everyone who plays it. For all of the game’s sense of scale and cinematic sweep, these are superficial aesthetics that come at the expense of gameplay.Set in a fictional 13th Century Japan, Ghost of Tsushima is beautiful and brutal from the very beginning. Choosing this setting lets you play the game like a classic black-and-white samurai movie (even if I must argue that Kurosawa’s greatest masterpiece is Ran, which was shot in colour), which looks terrific until you find yourself lost among the crowd or fail to read the signals to dodge or parry, which appear as coloured glints on an enemy’s weapon. The fundamental problem with Tsushima can be best summed up by its Kurosawa mode. ![]() There are interesting ideas such as learning to use different stances against specific enemy types, but you’ll also have to fight against the absence of a manual targeting system and a wayward camera more interested in spectacle than function. ![]() It’s at its best when you’re fighting in one-on-one duels set to an epic backdrop, or when challenging your first enemy to a Stand-off with the same tension of a showdown in a Western.īut these are also just a fraction of your encounters since most of Tsushima‘s combat involves taking on mobs that are in turn messy and an irritating exercise in attrition. And in the year of our Lord 2020, why are there still tailing missions?įor players put off by the masochistic difficulty of Nioh or Sekiro, the good news is that combat is on the more forgiving side, where kills and parries are rewarded with resolve gauges that can be spent on healing or special attacks. Yet even though you’re supposed to be able to mix up samurai and ghost playstyles, you’re also frequently forced into stealth situations with insta-fail penalties. Worse are the hackneyed stealth mechanics, which you’ll find yourself using just to alleviate from overwhelming combat situations. Traversal feels straight out of an Uncharted game, where climbing cliffs or using a grapple hook have obvious prescribed paths – hardly what you’d expect in an open world game. This is most apparent when you’re surveying an enemy encampment, which initially seems like it’s going to give you multiple options only for it to fall to one set solution. Yet the missions themselves are rigidly linear in design. But it’s an indecisive approach, where sometimes the lack of navigation has you running around lost, while in another instance the wind blows aggressively against you when you deviate just slightly off course.īetween the main objective, you’ll discover secrets, liberate villages, and more interestingly help allies in their own tales, many which run in parallel to the campaign. It does try to remove the usual open world clutter by having an unsubtle wind guide you to your objective instead of waypoints, while speaking to people might alert you to points of interest that appear on the world map. ![]() ![]() ![]() This allow you remove the effect of aįor example " +gravity" will return the gravity setting to the initial The latter is generally used to turn off the setting, or reset it Many of the options have both a ' -' and a ' +' Settings set values, Operators actually preform someĪre command line options that only save information, that will be used Types of Options - Operators and Settings.Ī summary of the following is now also available from the ImageMagick Website on TheĪll command line options will now fall into two basic groups: 'settings' and And you would do them in the exact order you want to process the And ' ' being eitherĪn image read or create, or image processing operation that actually 'does That is.Ĭommand "image" ' being repeated with as many 'reads' or Use the final 'implicit write' argument to write out the result. So the correct way to do this in IMv6 is to read the image, process and then Operation, that of translate an image in a file to an image in memory. In fact you may like to consider a 'image read/create'Īlso as an operation as well. Note that no 'operation' should be given, before at least one image is either In my thinking broken, producing numerous odd and unexpected results. In essence command line usage in versions before version 6 was ill-defined and Worked in IM version 5 work as you would expect IM version 6. On the other hand just about every 'simple' command that The solution to the problem, unfortunately required a drastic measure and some Probably have required a pipeline, or intermediate save images to achieve it. This sort of fine control was just beyond previous versions of IM, and would The various image operations such as " -negate", " -resize", and " -crop", etc, could appear eitherīefore or after the image it was meant to apply to.įor example under version 5.5.7 the following two commands were equally valid This worked, and is the basic style that was used in version 5.5.7. Objects with an enormous number of operations that can be performed on themĪs a consequence of this the above slowly expanded to become.Ĭommand image1 image2 output_image The cause of the problem was that ImageMagick followed a fairly standard UNIXĬommand input_image output_imageĪs time went on this started to produce problems, as images are complex Time, as the author of IM, constantly battled with the interface to get it Also, what worked one time may not work in the same order another ![]() ![]() Haphazard, and confusing to anyone trying to make sense of what was actually Involving the order in which operations were performed. ![]() In previous major version of ImageMagick (version 5.5.7 and earlier) theĬommand line interface into the IM library has been prone to problems ImageMagick Command Line Processing Why did the command line style change! or. This section is well worth knowing and understanding. Even if you only use the Application Program Interface (API), With this background knowledge the rest of the examples provided pages becomes The new image processing abilities, the ideas, philosophy, and methodology,Īnd what is actually going on, internally. Here we explain in detail the command line processing that IM follows, some of Some Speed Tests based on Quality ImageMagick Operational Controls.Image Type when Reading and Writing Controling the Quality of Images.Virtual Canvas, and the Page and Repage Operators.Combining Image List Operations Complex Image Processing and Debugging Meta-data: Attributes, Properties and Artifacts.Parenthesis - processing images 'on-the-side'.Conjure - Experimental IM Scripting Language.Import - Read Images from On-screen Display.Montage - generating arrays of thumbnails.Composite - overlaying images in special ways.Identify Alternatives - Text Output Options.Identify as a floating point Calculator.Identify - Output information about this image.Delayed Percent Escapes ImageMagick Commands. ![]() ![]() It even has editing tools like trimming videos, cropping, adding watermarks, changing brightness, contrast, and more.Īnother feature of the program is that it has the ability to record onscreen actions for tutorial-style videos. It is one of the best video conversion software that converts 30x faster than some other programs to different file formats including WMV to AVI, VOB to AVI, and even converts video to Youtube or vice-versa with high quality. ![]() ![]() We can use the software to convert any audio and video file formats for playback on the most popular players including iPod, iPhone, Apple TV, Zune, PSP, Pocket PC, Creative Zen, Archos, and so on. This program previously known as Wondershare video converter ultimate is a very powerful all-in-one digital video & audio converter, DVD ripper, burn videos to DVD/bly-ray discs, online video downloader, video editor, screen recorder, gif maker, etc. Thanks to its unique technology of Full Hardware Acceleration, which makes all video processing speed 47 times faster than usual. If you want to redefine video resolution, re-adjust screen ratio, or fix the problem of audio not being in sync with the video, VideoProc Converter also got you covered. VideoProc Converter provides a way to backup DVD content into a cloud space or to another physical DVD disc.īesides, if you want to put your DVD movies into your pocket, it’s also no problem when you to choose digitize DVDs into MP4 or MP3. Especially when downloading something online, you can save them in another format at the same time.Īging on DVD is something we cannot avoid, but how to make the damage less? For instance, MKV to MP4, MOV to MP4, AVI to MP4, WMV to MP4, FLV to MP4, MP4 to MP3, WAV to MP3, and so on. ![]() It is a complete all-in-one video toolbox to convert video or audio from nearly any format, compress videos in a customized way, record screens, download videos & audio for free, edit videos, and more.Ī powerful media converter lets you quickly convert videos to MP4, MP3, or any audio to MP3 with just one click. VideoProc Converter belongs to Digiarty Software Inc., a media software developer that focus on DVD & video conversion development since 2006. ![]() ![]() ![]() While it is widely accepted that the probability of having rogue code intentionally injected by the third-party is low, there are still cases of malicious injections in third-party code after the organization's servers were compromised (ex: Yahoo, January 2014). As the client reaches the hosting website/application, this third-party code gets executed, thus granting the third-party the exact same privileges that were granted to the user (similar to XSS attacks).Īny testing performed prior to entering production loses some of its validity, including AST testing ( IAST, RAST, SAST, DAST, etc.). This risk arises from the fact that third-party JavaScript code is rarely reviewed by the invoking party prior to its integration into a website/application. Risk 2: Execution of arbitrary code on client systems ¶ Typical defenses include, but are not restricted to: in-house script mirroring (to prevent alterations by 3rd parties), sub-resource integrity (to enable browser-level interception) and secure transmission of the third-party code (to prevent modifications while in-transit). This risk arises from the fact that there is usually no guaranty that the code hosted at the third-party will remain the same as seen from the developers and testers: new features may be pushed in the third-party code at any time, thus potentially breaking the interface or data-flows and exposing the availability of your application to its users/customers. Risk 1: Loss of control over changes to the client application ¶
|
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |